Re-Visioning Occupational Therapy - Dr Kondekar opens the new dimensions of learning beyond just vocational executions

Re-Visioning Occupational Therapy in Autism

From Domain-Wise Repetition to Dynamic Hierarchical Cognitive Learning

Image

Occupational therapy has traditionally been organised around domains such as sensory integration, fine motor strengthening, and gross motor training.

While these domains provide useful structure, over-reliance on domain-wise repetition can unintentionally shift therapy toward activity execution rather than learning development.

There is a growing need to re-vision occupational therapy as a dynamic cognitive learning discipline, where motor activities are tools — not the end goal.


The Limitation of Domain-Wise Repetition

Structured repetition within domains often leads to:

  • Activity familiarity without cognitive expansion

  • Task dependence

  • Reduced problem solving

  • Limited generalisation

  • Plateau in communication

Children may become skilled at performing therapy tasks but show minimal growth in thinking, communication, or adaptability.


The Shift: From Activity Execution to Learning Execution

Therapy must evolve from:

👉 “What activity is the child doing?”

to

👉 “What new thinking is the child developing?”

This represents a shift from performance-based therapy to learning-based therapy.


Dr Kondekars Dynamic Hierarchical Cognitive-Verbal Model

A revised framework for occupational therapy should focus on structured progression through cognitive and verbal complexity.

Level 1 — Regulation and Engagement

Body organisation, attention readiness

Level 2 — Interaction and Exploration

Cause-effect learning, curiosity

Level 3 — Problem Solving

Adaptive thinking, flexibility

Level 4 — Concept Building

Understanding relationships, abstract thinking

Level 5 — Communication Integration

Using language and social interaction

Level 6 — Generalisation

Applying learning across contexts

This hierarchy ensures therapy moves forward developmentally rather than remaining static.


Motor Activities as Cognitive Tools

Fine motor and sensory activities remain valuable when used to:

  • Support problem solving

  • Encourage interaction

  • Introduce novelty

  • Promote communication

Muscle strengthening alone is not the developmental goal — cognitive engagement is.


Executing New Thoughts

True therapy success is seen when children begin to:

✔️ Generate ideas
✔️ Adapt responses
✔️ Ask questions
✔️ Show curiosity
✔️ Apply learning

This reflects execution of thought rather than execution of activity.


Progressive Concepts Over Static Tasks

Therapy sessions should introduce progressively complex ideas rather than repeating identical tasks.

Progression drives neuroplasticity and prevents rigidity.


Revised Case Studies — Through the Lens of Re-Visioned Therapy

Case 1 — From Puzzle Performance to Cognitive Flexibility

Previous model:
Repeated puzzle completion

Re-visioned approach:

  • Introduced problem-solving variations

  • Asked predictive questions

  • Added storytelling around tasks

  • Encouraged verbal reasoning

Outcome:

✅ Increased spontaneous speech
✅ Improved flexibility
✅ Better conceptual understanding

Clinical insight:
Shift from task execution to thought execution created learning.


Case 2 — From Sensory Routine to Interactive Learning

Previous model:
Daily sensory circuits

Re-visioned approach:

  • Sensory activities paired with problem solving

  • Turn taking games

  • Communication goals integrated

  • Novel challenges introduced

Outcome:

✅ Improved engagement
✅ Increased joint attention
✅ Better adaptive behaviour

Clinical insight:
Sensory input supported learning only when cognitively integrated.


Case 3 — From Comfort Zone to Developmental Progression

Previous model:
Repeated familiar tasks to maintain calm

Re-visioned approach:

  • Gradual hierarchy of difficulty

  • Predictable but varied tasks

  • Encouraged choice making

  • Introduced real-life scenarios

Outcome:

✅ Increased adaptability
✅ Reduced avoidance
✅ Greater confidence

Clinical insight:
Hierarchy enabled growth without overwhelming the child.


Case 4 — From Verbal Drill to Communication Thinking

Previous model:
Flashcard naming

Re-visioned approach:

  • Conversation scenarios

  • Open-ended questioning

  • Narrative building

  • Emotional understanding tasks

Outcome:

✅ Improved conversational ability
✅ Increased spontaneous language
✅ Better social understanding

Clinical insight:
Language develops through thinking, not memorisation.


Implications for Occupational Therapy Practice

Therapists should design sessions that:

  • Progress hierarchically

  • Integrate cognition and communication

  • Introduce novelty

  • Encourage thinking

  • Promote generalisation


The Future Role of Occupational Therapy

Occupational therapists are not only domain specialists — they are developmental learning designers.

Their role is to bridge motor engagement with cognitive and social development through structured progression.


Integrating With the 4 D Framework

Re-visioned therapy naturally aligns with:

Dynamicity → Changing experiences
Diversity → Varied contexts
Difficulty → Progressive challenge
Differences → Individual pathways


Dr Kondekars Perspective

Modern occupational therapy draws from sensory integration theory (Ayres), neurodevelopmental treatment approaches like the Bobath concept, and culturally responsive frameworks such as the Kawa model, all of which emphasize individualized, dynamic, and meaningful participation rather than rote repetition. Contemporary literature also highlights the importance of diversity, cultural humility, assistive technologies, and recognition of sensory processing differences in shaping effective therapeutic interventions.

When therapy shifts from strengthening muscles to strengthening thinking, the developmental trajectory changes.

Children move from performing tasks to understanding concepts.

This is where real independence begins.


Key Message

Occupational therapy should not be defined by activities performed, but by learning achieved.


References 

Ayres AJ. Sensory Integration and the Child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1979.

Ayres AJ. Sensory Integration and Learning Disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1972.

Schaaf RC, Mailloux Z. Clinician’s guide for implementing Ayres Sensory Integration: promoting participation for children with autism. Bethesda: AOTA Press; 2015.

Bundy AC, Lane SJ, Murray EA, editors. Sensory Integration: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2002.

Iwama MK. The Kawa Model: Culturally Relevant Occupational Therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2006.

Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 5th ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications; 2014.

Bobath B. Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and Treatment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1990.

Kielhofner G. Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington DC: APA


Author Prof. Dr Santosh Kondekar MBBS, MD (Pediatrics), DNB (Pediatrics), FAIMER Fellowship in Pediatric Neurology & Epilepsy Postgraduate Diploma in Developmental Neurology Professor of Pediatrics Developmental Neuro Pediatrician TN Medical College & BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai Director — AAKAAR Clinic Child Development Center Mumbai, India 📞 9869405747 🌐 www.autismdoctor.in for all post links click https://speechandsenses.blogspot.com/p/httpsspeechandsenses.html

Comments