Saturday, October 25, 2025

Dr Kondekars hypothesis of autism as sensory equivalent of Cerebral palsy

Autism as the “sensory equivalent of cerebral palsy,” as conceptualized by Dr. Santosh Kondekar, is a profound reframing of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Rather than seeing autism as merely a behavioral or psychiatric condition, Kondekar’s model places it in the domain of pediatric neurology — specifically in the category of **neurodevelopmental disconnection syndromes**, where sensory processing and integration are disrupted much like motor coordination is affected in cerebral palsy (CP).[1][2]

### Introduction: A New Lens on Autism

Dr. Santosh Kondekar, a developmental pediatrician and neurodevelopmental specialist from Mumbai’s Nair Hospital, presents autism as a disorder of **internal brain communication** rather than purely social or linguistic deficits. In his “neuronal nutrition and bridging hypothesis,” he proposes that children with autism experience a **reticular activating system (RAS)** deficit — meaning the internal neural networks that connect various sensory, cognitive, and emotional centers of the brain are underdeveloped or poorly synchronized. Just as cerebral palsy involves motor pathway dysfunction, autism involves **sensory and perceptual pathway dyscoordination** — hence the analogy of autism as a “sensory cerebral palsy”.[2]

### The Conceptual Bridge: From Motor to Sensory

Cerebral palsy impairs the brain’s ability to coordinate muscle control due to early neurological injury. Similarly, Kondekar’s model posits that autism represents **developmental dyscoordination of sensation, perception, and meaning-making** rather than of muscles. The core issue lies not in the muscles or sensory receptors themselves but in the “bridging” circuits that integrate sensory information into coherent representation. In this model:

- Sensory overload or hyposensitivity corresponds to “sensory spasticity or flaccidity,” analogous to the tone variations seen in cerebral palsy.

- Stereotypic behaviors such as flapping or spinning are “self-generated sensory physiotherapy,” the brain’s attempt to recalibrate misfiring pathways.

- Delays in speech and social engagement result from **failure of auditory learning pathways to synchronize**, not from absence of intent or intelligence.[1][2]

### The Reticular Activating System Deficit

The **reticular activating system (RAS)** in the brainstem acts as a neural “conductor,” synchronizing auditory, visual, and motor inputs into unified perception and response. According to the Kondekar Hypothesis, autistic behaviors stem from a **defective or immature RAS**, leading to asynchronous sensory processing. The brain “hears but does not understand,” “sees but does not interpret,” producing the appearance of social withdrawal. These children are inwardly active — their sensory systems are “online” but lack **cross-modal coherence**, yielding fragmented experience.[2]

### Neuronal Nutrition and Synaptic Bridging

To repair sensory coordination, Kondekar advocates what he calls a **neuronal nutrition hypothesis**, emphasizing targeted nutritional and neuroplastic support.

He envisions this process as “building neural bridges” — enhancing myelination, synapse formation, and RAS connectivity. This involves:

- **Nutritional therapy:** omega-3 fats, phospholipids, cofactors like B12 and zinc, amino acids crucial for synaptogenesis.

- **Goal-directed stimulation:** structured auditory, motor, and social exercises to repeatedly co-activate underconnected neurons.

- **Time-bound milestones:** measurable improvements every 8–12 weeks determine protocol adjustment.

These biological and behavioral interventions collectively promote neuroplastic integration akin to physiotherapy for cerebral palsy, but applied to sensory systems.[1][2]

### Sensory Autism as Functional Disconnection

MRI studies by Kondekar and others show that many children with autism have **subtle white matter disconnections** — periventricular leukomalacia, corpus callosum thinning, delayed myelination — mirroring cerebral palsy’s findings but at a microstructural or metabolic scale. This supports the idea that autism represents a **distributed network disorder** where intra-brain communication (RAS-mediated) is insufficient, even if cortical tissue appears “intact.” Thus, autism might be regarded as “functional cerebral palsy” — an impairment of sensory and cognitive coordination rather than anatomical damage.[3]

### Practical Clinical Application: Rehabilitation of Senses

Dr. Kondekar’s treatment algorithm borrowed from rehabilitation medicine parallels CP therapy:

1. **Assessment phase:** mapping sensory dominance (visual vs. auditory learners).

2. **Rehabilitation phase:** converting the child from “visual to auditory” learner to promote verbal cognition.

3. **Socialization phase:** graded exposure to social contexts, promoting real-world sensory integration.

4. **Reinforcement phase:** maintenance of achieved sensory gains through daily home routines and caregiver consistency.

This structured, time-bound, goal-oriented progression aligns with physiotherapy logic: retrain dysfunctional systems through repetitive, neuroplastic practice.[4][2][1]

### Sensory Physiology and Learning Algorithms

Kondekar’s Q&A sessions elaborate that early human learning follows a **“seeing → hearing → speaking → doing”** hierarchy. In autism, this sequence is fragmented — often stuck at the “seeing” level (i.e., strong visual learners but weak auditory-verbal response). Autism therapy therefore focuses on training the auditory and reticular systems to catch up — through rhythm, imitation, tone matching, and speech exercises — to convert visual learners into **auditory learners** and, ultimately, communicators.[5][6][1]

### Comparing Autism and Cerebral Palsy

| Feature | Cerebral Palsy | Autism |

|----------|----------------|--------|

| Primary dysfunction | Motor coordination | Sensory integration |

| Brain system affected | Pyramidal/extrapyramidal tracts | Reticular-thalamic-cortical networks |

| Core marker | Spasticity, hypotonia, motor delay | Hypo-/hyper-sensitivity, sensory chaos |

| Structural lesions | White matter injury, PVL | Microconnectivity deficits, RAS hypoactivity |

| Rehabilitation | Physiotherapy, constraint training | Sensory reeducation, auditory-social retraining |

| Outcome metric | Mobility, posture | Communication, social behavior |

The analogy holds that **autism is sensory paralysis** the way cerebral palsy is motor paralysis — with differing manifestations but shared pathophysiology of early neurodevelopmental dyscoordination.[7][2]

### Sensory Integration and Motor Co-activation

Recent studies affirm that sensory-motor training improves attention, coordination, and language skills in ASD. Interventions such as **motor-sensory rooms**, proprioceptive play, and rhythm-based therapies enhance inter-hemispheric communication. These empirical findings coincide with Kondekar’s sensory-equivalent rehabilitation framework: the more senses co-activate under meaningful learning tasks, the more the RAS synchronizes, reducing chaotic behaviors and improving learning “bandwidth.”[8]

### Autistic Behaviors Reinterpreted

From this sensory-cerebral palsy perspective, core autism behaviors gain new meaning:

- **Flapping and spinning:** self-generated vestibular feedback, akin to repetitive physiotherapy.

- **Sensory avoidance:** a defensive reflex against “sensory hypertonia.”

- **Fixations or rituals:** stabilizing circuits that provide predictable sensory patterns.

The therapeutic goal then is not suppression but **guided redirection** of these movements into functionally organized acts — sensory equivalents of occupational and physical therapy.[6][8]

### Integrating Goal-Directed Cognition

Dr. Kondekar extends the model to cognitive-behavioral domains via **goal-directed cognitive therapy**, promoting self-motivated task orientation, adaptive behavior, and metacognitive awareness. Here the “mind exercises” parallel motor training in CP — structured, repeated, and progressively challenging goals gradually rewire fragmented sensory and executive circuits. When strategies are personalized, the child learns not just tasks but **how to plan, monitor, and regulate learning**, catalyzing generalized improvement.[1]

### Neuroplasticity, Hope, and Parental Engagement

Kondekar emphasizes **hope as a neuroplastic catalyst** — families who “train with belief” produce measurable gains. He critiques the fatalistic “acceptance movements” in autism communities that glorify disability instead of retraining potential. His message “Don’t be special, be social” urges active engagement rather than passive labeling. For parents, commitment, structured routines, and daily sensory challenges are as critical as physiotherapy for CP recovery.[4][6]

### Neurobiological Parallels

Both autism and CP share early-life vulnerability, perinatal factors, and neuroinflammatory markers. Studies show overlapping sensory deficits — proprioceptive in CP, auditory in autism — and shared cerebellar involvement, underscoring Kondekar’s analogy of **shared pathogenesis through disrupted neural connectivity**. In both, therapy seeks to **expand the child’s operational neural map** through environmental and sensory scaffolding.[9][7]

### Toward a Unified Neurodevelopmental Model

Kondekar’s integrative approach bridges neurochemistry, systems neuroscience, and clinical rehabilitation. The **autism-cerebral palsy equivalence** model reframes both as **early-life network disorders** on a continuum — differing only in which neural subnetworks are dysregulated (motor vs. sensory-perceptual). This perspective encourages cross-pollination of therapeutic strategies: applying physiotherapy logic to autism and sensory retraining logic to CP.[7][2]

### Clinical Implications

1. **Early detection** of sensory asymmetry may predict later autism, just as early tone abnormalities predict CP.

2. **Multimodal MRI (MRS, tractography)** helps map sensory dysconnectivity — offering objective follow-up markers.[10]

3. **Neuroimmune workup** (fungus, metals, microbiome) ensures systemic contributors do not block sensory rehabilitation.[10]

4. **Realistic timelines:** measurable progress within 100 days, using his structured monitoring protocol.[4]

5. **Team approach:** pediatric neurologist, OT, speech therapist, sensory educator — guided by hierarchical sensory goals rather than symptom-suppression.[11][1]

### Ethical and Philosophical Perspective

This paradigm shift implies autism isn’t a static identity but a **developing brain’s sensory imprisonment**, awaiting coordinated rehabilitation. Just as we wouldn’t romanticize spasticity in CP, Kondekar urges not to glorify sensory isolation. The model bridges biomedical empathy and neuroeducational pragmatism — a union of neuroscience and hope.[6][1]

### Conclusion

Autism, in Dr. Kondekar’s framework, is “**cerebral palsy of senses**” — a condition where the brain’s communication highways are underconstructed rather than destroyed. By treating autism through the lens of delayed sensory integration, his approach unites neurology, rehabilitation, and cognitive science. It transforms the narrative from permanent disorder to correctable disconnection, from social isolation to progressively trainable sociability. The sensory-motor neuroplastic continuum connecting autism and cerebral palsy not only redefines treatment goals but also rehumanizes developmental medicine — affirming that, with structured nourishment, goals, and perseverance, **the brain can relearn to connect**.

This conceptual revolution — aligning autism with the principles of cerebral palsy rehabilitation — may herald a new frontier in pediatric neurorehabilitation grounded in science, structure, and the unwavering belief that every disconnected brain can bridge its way to expression and meaning.[2][7][1]

Sources

[1] Dr Kondekar Santosh , Associate Professor Pediatrics Nair Hospital ... https://www.autismdrmumbai.com

[2] History of case of Autism: DSM V way by www ... https://autismmumbai.com/dsm-5-autism-history-dr-kondekar/

[3] International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics | April-June 2016 | Vol 3 | Issue 2 Page 334 https://www.ijpediatrics.com/index.php/ijcp/article/download/242/238/947

[4] bestautismdoctor.in https://www.bestautismdoctor.in

[5] Autism Q&A with Dr Santosh Kondekar Episode 1 - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVr4f6Tetsw

[6] Understanding Autism with Dr. Santosh Kondekar. 09 ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=391diNxMiAc

[7] Cerebral Palsy and Autism | Find Help and Treatment ... https://www.cerebralpalsyguide.com/cerebral-palsy/coexisting-conditions/autism/

[8] Preliminary Results of Sensorimotor Room Training for the Improvement of Sensory and Motor Skills in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11755627/

[9] Association between sensory processing and activity ... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7990726/

[10] www.autismdoctor.in https://www.autismdoctor.in

[11] Dr Santosh Kondekar Mumbai Developmental Pediatrician https://nayi-disha.org/business/developmental-pediatrician-medical/dr-santosh-kondekar/

[12] Efficacy and Safety of Altibrain® as an Adjunctive Therapy for Autism ... https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39865822/

[13] Effects of Sensory-Motor Issues on The Performance of Activities of Daily Livings in Autism Spectrum Disorder https://www.academia.edu/66088403/Effects_of_Sensory_Motor_Issues_on_The_Performance_of_Activities_of_Daily_Livings_in_Autism_Spectrum_Disorder

[14] Understanding Autism with Dr. Santosh Kondekar. Topic - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flK_6qQKkYA

[15] sensory issues http://kondekar.weebly.com/sensory-issues.html

[16] The spectrum of electroencephalographic characteristics in ... https://ijnonline.org/article-details/19373

[17] Understanding Autism with Dr. Santosh Kondekar. Topic- 3 Dear parents, Never Give Up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDcRCLKIJjo

[18] Know the best ways to help children deal with the problem ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nJLo-dtydI

[19] Dr Santosh Kondekar Mumbai - डॉ. संतोष कोंडेकर मुंबई - Nayi Disha https://nayi-disha.org/hi/business/dr-santosh-kondekar/

[20] Aakaar clinic: ADHD Autism Doctor Mumbai, india, Neuro ... https://business.google.com/v/_/07818215062904892809/75d1/_/rev/

Friday, October 24, 2025

Vocabulary list and development of Vocabulary steps as per Dr Kondekars autism protocol

🧠 Dr. Kondekar’s Goal-Directed Cognitive Approach: Building Vocabulary for Children with Autism & Learning Issues

🌟 Step 1: Readiness — Eye Contact & Connection

  • When the child starts looking at you, he is ready to listen.
  • Begin with eye-to-eye interactions and familiar faces — “Mama,” “Papa,” “Baby,” or their names.
  • Teach what the child connects with first — living beings and family members.
  • Then move to:
    • Moving things (easy to notice)
    • Big and visible things
    • Daily objects (near the child’s surroundings)
    • Close-distance objects first, then distant ones

The first vocabulary must come from the child’s world — what he sees, touches, and feels daily.


📖 Step 2: Vocabulary Notebook — Building the Base

Make a 100-page notebook divided into 4 columns:

Word Knows Shows/Points Says
  • Dedicate 6 pages per room: kitchen, hall, bedroom, bathroom, etc.
  • Cover visible and useful objects.
  • Around 500–600 words will form the child’s primary syllabus of “visible/sight words.”

Focus on words the child can see and use daily.


🏃 Step 3: Verbs — Learning Actions

Once the child knows around 1000 object words, he’s ready for action words (verbs).

  • Prepare a list of 100 action words (e.g., run, eat, sleep, clap, open, close).
  • Teach 3 new verbs per day — goal: 100 verbs in 2 months.
  • As verbs are understood, the child begins to follow commands and understand short sentences.

“Action” gives meaning to “objects” — verbs make words come alive.


🎨 Step 4: Adjectives — Describing the World

Next, introduce adjectives — describing words.
Start from visible concepts and easy contrasts:

Early Adjectives Later Adjectives
Small / Big Right / Left
Short / Tall Hot / Cold
One / Many Hard / Soft
Good / Bad Heavy / Light

Teach by showing real-life contrasts, not just naming.


📚 Step 5: Story Listening — Connecting Words to Logic

When your child understands 3-word sentences, begin connected storytelling.

  • 5 short 10-line stories daily — mix of “show and tell” and action-based stories.
  • Encourage listening, pointing, and retelling in parts.
  • Story listening builds the foundation for:
    • Comprehension
    • Concept understanding
    • Logical thinking
    • Conversational skills

Stories are the bridge from words to understanding and understanding to reasoning.


💡 Summary Flow

  1. 👁️ Eye contact → readiness
  2. 🏠 Familiar nouns (people & objects) → ~1000 words
  3. 🏃 Verbs → ~100 action words
  4. 🎨 Adjectives → describing & comparing
  5. 📖 Stories → comprehension, logic, and conversation

“Vocabulary growth is not just word learning — it’s concept learning.”
Dr. Santosh Kondekar, Aakaar Clinic for Autism, Byculla, 


Dr. Kondekar’s Goal-Directed Vocabulary Growth Plan

Stage Focus Goal Tools
👁️ 1 Eye Contact & Familiar Faces Child ready to listen Start with Mama, Papa, Baby
🏠 2 Visible Objects 1000 words 4-column notebook (Word–Knows–Shows–Says)
🏃 3 Action Words 100 verbs 3 verbs/day, 2 months goal
🎨 4 Adjectives Describing visible contrasts Big/small, short/tall, right/left
📖 5 Story Listening Build comprehension & logic 5 stories/day, 10 lines each

➡️ “Teach what the child sees, hears, and does — not what he guesses.”
📍 Aakaar Clinic for Autism, Byculla, Mumbai
🌐 www.autismdoctor.in
📞 9869405747

Thursday, October 23, 2025

why parents often keep saying child is hyper despite medicines going on?

 As specified elsewhere on this website hyperness is always underestimated and misinterpreted.

to summarise again, 

according to dr kondekars goal directed cognitive approach in autism kids hyperness behaviour is of 2 types:

1. type 1:  with sound: these kids may have any one or many of the following: agitation, aggression, pinching, biting, shouting, screaming, throwing, tapping , banging, stamping, slapping,  breaking, clapping, making loud sounds, loud words, making sounds from objects, switching buttons on and off, opening and closing fridge door, hitting hurting others or self... and many more

2. type 2 :without sound: these kids may have any one or many of the following: fidgety, restless, movements in sitting, squirming,  often clearing the bottom, cannot sit like statue, touching here and there, on the go, walking, wandering, rhythmic movements, to and fro, on the go, getting carried away with eyes/hand/ feet, wandering, climbing on table / sofa/ chair / window, jumping, trying to touch at heights with hand, clumsy, careless, turning or moving  head / eyes/ body parts, playing with pen pencil / books, tossing, spinning and many more

often these issues are annoying to others, but parents may find as innocent or negligible as they are used to it.

often there is  pharmacology treatment / control medicines  for such behaviours which is very effective to show results in 2 to 5 days, the results need to be sustained by titrating the doses on weekly or monthly basis as needed to keep the child is full control of these diverting behaviours which make the child lose focus in learning. Therapy doesnot work effectively despite months to give same results what the medicines can give in a week, Medicines are needed to turn the child therapy able. not using medicines wastes time and crucial years of learning. Also, when we plan to stop it my non medical means, often force is used by shouting/ punishing or stopping with physical restrain which can also precipitate aggression sooner.


according to dr kondekars goal directed cognitive approach

how parents underestimate the problem or its severity:

1. they avoid telling these issues to doctor, as to some extent they feel it is normal... even if its annoying to other

2. they try to justify saying, 

                    kids shall do it, it is like normal, its only in retaliation, its only once in  a day, he hurts only when we ask xyz, or snatch xyz or trouble him or saying that his father alkso used  to do same in child hood, its just little, he doesnt do it at home or school or saying that he doesn only when i dont give medicines or he does with only in presence of xyz etc 

 3. they will try to justify saying it was a lot in past andnow its little

4. therapist may justify saying he is cooled down a lot.

5. oh he needs that sensory stimulation is another justification. if i do this/ give this etc he wont do it.

6. and many more reasons: like even doctors saying he doesnt need x y z medicine


all these reasons make a doctor undertreat the annoying behaviour. all these reasons will also make the parents reduce the doses of control medicines on their own or by forcing teh doctor to do so 

and then problem perisist saying, it all same despite treatment with medicines.


according to dr kondekars goal directed cognitive approach

MEDICINES ARE NO MAGICAL WANDS, THE NAME OF THE MEDICINE DOESNT MATTER, THE DOSE AND FREQUENCY NEEDED IS DECIDED BY THE SEVERITY AND FREQUENCY OF ISSUES.

**********************************************

according to dr kondekars goal directed cognitive approach

WHY PARENTS / PATIENTS TEND TO  STOP OR REDUCE MEDICINES ON THEIR OWN:

1. commonest reason is inconvenience that it has to be taken daily or many times a day even though they are cheap. often we may need higher doses or added medicines taht adds to inconvenience.

2. cost is just another factor even if parents disagree. as often dr / therapy  visits may be frequent and so does fees.

3. the scare about control medicines created by non allopath / paramedics and therapists/ doctors; despite not having many major side effect, dependency or addictive potential; if given as per doctor prescrpition. trsut me they are safe, and needed for quality of life.

4. often parents tend to give low dose saying that high dose caused sleep. remeber that sleep realted to any control medicines may not last more than 5 days if given regularly. even if sleep, dose may need to be tapered by doctor for a week and again needs to be pulled up. once a kid has slept with xyz dose doesnt mean he will sleep each time.

5. some parents will say we stopped medicine because he got hyper on stopping the dose. it happened because he needed daily dose and not stopping for some period.

6. some parents will say we stopped medicines because he turned aggressive with the medicine. often its vice versa, the medicine may have given to tackle aggressiveness. for some medicines like risperidone- aggression coming up may need doubling the dose. for some medicines  like atomoxetine, aggression coming up new may need reducing the dose.  very rarely say one in 100000 may have a situation that it doesnt suit. but then we do have alternatives. not treating is not  a solution.

7. and parents often say that we stopped because we donot knwo how long. but that doesnt solve the problem, not havinbg enough control means school will suffer. having a shadow teacher is not a solution to tackle hyperness. if instead of help in teaching she is used only to hold the child with hand, aggression is likely to worsen.


according to dr kondekars goal directed cognitive approach

how long do these kids will be needing control medicines to treat ADHD

  1. its very simple. till the time problem is.
  2. till the time child evolves out of the disability.
  3. till the time, 2 years symptom free phase is noted.
  4. till the time, we develop verbal understanding in the child enough to understand counselling and child can control  or manage even outbursts with his own control of thoughts and mind through is verbal thinking and understanding, like say with the help of cognitive behaviour therapy and meditation as needed.
  5. yes even some adults do need such treatment and 30% autism may have chance to turn into schizophrenia and sometimes even a 40 year old may start with need for control medicines due to this disorder of thought and feelings.
REMEMBER:
BEHAVIOUR IS A RESULT OF PERCEPTION.
PERCEPTION OF LIVING AND NON LIVING AROUND US A PER OUR IQ.
BEHAVIOUR IS ALSO RESULT OF BEHAVIOUR OF OTHERS WITH US.
AND ITS NOT POSSIBLE TO CHNAGE ABOVE TWO.
ONLY TWO THINGS THAT CAN HELP ADJUST WITH RO CHANGE THE BEHAVIOUR ARE:
1. COGNITIVE VERBAL UNDERSTANDING TO CONTROL THE BEHAVIOUR BY INTROSPECTION: TAKES YEARS TO COME.
2. MEDICINES



autism as sensory cerebral palsy

adhd protocol by dr kondekar

Monday, October 13, 2025

Dr Kondekar on World cerebral palsy day 2025

https://youtu.be/zVNcAs96Q2s?si=p7PlB7NTM-8yzYNA link to watch 2 hour video discussion  about cerebral palsy in Marathi language kn Doordarshan. Oct 2025 word CP day

Dr Kondekar talking on cerebral palsy in children, a marathi program in door darshan Sahyadri Chanel
Cerebral palsy is a disorder of muscle tone and posture due to some insult to developing brain usually at or before birth, due to unknown reasons.
Cerebral palsy kids often present with developmental delay as late sitter, late walker, slow walker, weakness of one or other or both sides of body with or without joint deformities affecting various functions of hand feet and locomotion. Often they may also have issues like squint deafness speech delay low IQ epilepsy and behavioural issues as added complications in some cases.
There is something that can be done for everything to improve personality of kids. So management of cerebral palsy is multidisciplinary involving many different experts and therapists.
For any questions related to cerebral palsy management whatsapp 9869405747 india.
www.neuropediatrician.com

Dr Kondekars hypothesis of autism as sensory equivalent of Cerebral palsy

Autism as the “sensory equivalent of cerebral palsy,” as conceptualized by Dr. Santosh Kondekar, is a profound reframing of autism spectrum ...